Auto DTM extraction may give unpredictable results.
Virtual Surveyor allows interactive exact placement of survey items by the user. Some photogrammetry software allows what they call automatic ground extraction or DTM creation. This process is algorithmic based and it is not based on return values as available in LiDAR data. Not using the DSM from your photogrammetry software limits the accuracy and detail of your survey data.
Advantages of the DSM:
- You are using the full resolution of your drone flight.
- Placement of survey items is determined by you.
- You have total control of data extraction.
Disadvantage of the DTM:
- Some software decimates the data before object extraction by a factor of five.
- Classification of surface data is based on a programmer's assumptions.
- Results are many times not available until the end of long processing times.
- Changes in the extraction variables require lengthy reprocessing.
Real world example:
In the example below, one of our clients called and said that Virtual Surveyor was changing the elevations by approximately two feet. The client was performing a construction verification survey and had multiple control points on the project. After checking his ground control and the data in his photogrammetry software and there was a definite discrepancy. After a lot of investigation, I discovered that he had the DTM generation option turned on in his software and he had used that file to create his Virtual Surveyor project. After we recreated the project using the correct file (DSM and not the DTM) all the elevations verified correctly and our client produced some great looking CAD drawings.
The yellow box in the image above is the area that is show in images "A" and "B" below. Image A is the surface created using the DTM file from the photogrammetry software. Image B depicts the project that was created using the DSM file with maximum detail setting in the photogrammetry software.
Image "A" DTM Detail:
Image "B" DSM Detail:
As shown on the table below, you can see the elevation differences between the DSM and the DTM. Also notice that there is much more detail in image "B" especially around the standpipe labeled as location number 3 in both screen captures. Image "A" does not show the standpipe and also modeled depressions in the surface that do not exist. Close examination of the dam surface revealed that the top was at or near and elevation of 742 ft. The top of the dam in the DTM model varied in elevation from 737.7 ft to 739.4 ft with a high spot at location number 2 as shown on image "A"
|Surface||Point #1||Point #2|
|Digital Surface Model (DTM) Image "A"||738.70 ft||740.35 ft|
|Digital Terrain Model (DSM) Image "B"||741.14 ft||741.91 ft|
|Elevation Difference||2.44 ft||1.56 ft|
While it is tempting to try and save some time, the above example illustrates the inaccuracy that can happen from using automated solutions that you have no control over. In the example above it is fortunate that the user double checked his data before proceeding forward with additional work. It is better to have a 100% data set that you have confidence in rather than wondering and having to reprocess multiple time. As a land surveyor, I want to decide what I keep for my DTM. Using the full DSM along with Virtual Surveyor provides me total control of what I need in my topographic survey.